Your browser doesn't support javascript. This means that the content or functionality of our website will be limited or unavailable. If you need more information about Vinnova, please contact us.

Our e-services for applications, projects and assessments close on Thursday 30 January at 4:30pm because of system upgrades. We expect to open them again on Friday 31 January at 8am the latest.

Methodology development for accounting of negative emissions via BECCS - case study CHP

Reference number
Coordinator Biorecro AB
Funding from Vinnova SEK 1 000 000
Project duration September 2021 - September 2022
Status Completed
Venture Circular and biobased economy
Call Circular and climate-neutral industry - From theory to practice 2021

Important results from the project

The project was created to strengthen Swedish energy companies´ opportunities to develop BECCS, by offering a method for demonstrating the net negative emissions of carbon dioxide produced by their planned facility. The project goal was to increase Swedish producers´ competitiveness to sell their negative emissions to external parties. The project has resulted in a tool now available and free to use. In addition to providing an estimation of the amount of negative emissions, the tool can also be used to decide which parameters in the value chain have the greatest impact on the net.

Expected long term effects

The project resulted in the development of tools that can calculate the number of net tonnes that a BECCS system produces. results result is that the producers got an opportunity to understand their planned system better and thus be able to influence the design of the value chain to increase the climate benefits. results expected result is to contribute to the public discussion about how much climate benefit is created net by BECCS. At the company presentations that have been made, the tool and other documentation have given rise to many interesting follow-up questions and ideas.

Approach and implementation

Conclusions from the implementation are that there was an unexpectedly large gap between how the research world and the cogeneration industry communicate and which words and concepts are used. Bridging the distance went well, but required a little more work than we expected. Another conclusion is that each cogeneration plant is unique and that it is a challenge to make the balance between simplifying the tool and at the same time making it suitable for many different plants. Another conclusion is that there is potential to continue developing the tool to make it more user friendly.

The project description has been provided by the project members themselves and the text has not been looked at by our editors.

Last updated 21 October 2022

Reference number 2021-03240