Your browser doesn't support javascript. This means that the content or functionality of our website will be limited or unavailable. If you need more information about Vinnova, please contact us.

AutoPack 2.0 - Automatic packaging and assembly of electrical cables based on optimization and machine learning

Reference number
Coordinator Linköpings universitet - Institutionen för ekonomisk och industriell utveckling
Funding from Vinnova SEK 3 599 780
Project duration June 2021 - May 2024
Status Completed
Venture FFI - Sustainable Production
Call Sustainable production - FFI - December 2020
End-of-project report 2020-05173sv.pdf(pdf, 2007 kB) (In Swedish)

Important results from the project

The goal of the project is to increase the degree of digitalisation and automation within product and production development and ensure that production and assembly aspects are taken into account in early phases. Within the project, we have developed a tool for optimal cable routing that automatically delivers routings that minimizes material consumption. The tool has been connected in a framework for ergonomic simulation so that ergonomic aspects during assembly can be balanced against other functional requirements (such as material consumption and cost).

Expected long term effects

The project´s objective was to save 50% of the engineering hours spent on cable installations (which today is more than 10,000 hours/year) and to reduce the lead time by 25% for the installation work. The project has shown a 60% reduction in engineering hours and a 15% reduction in lead time. Today the developed framework does not take into account all aspects of cabling, which is why some manual work is still required after the automated process. Continued development of the framework will increase the quality of the installations and thus reduce the lead time further.

Approach and implementation

The project has been led by LiU and the other partners were Fraunhofer-Chalmers Center and Volvo Car Corporation. The project was divided into 6 work packages (APs) where AP1 set the requirements, AP2-5 developed different methods and tools which were validated in AP6. Overall, the project has worked well with structured follow-up, good communication between the project partners and the project has found a balance between the different partners´ goals. Some redistribution between the APs has been done, where time from AP5 was redistributed to AP2 and AP3.

The project description has been provided by the project members themselves and the text has not been looked at by our editors.

Last updated 19 July 2024

Reference number 2020-05173